1 |
No plausible position is taken on the topic; severely lacking in examples, reasons and/or evidence |
Disorganized; little or no focus; incoherent |
Contains fundamental vocabulary mistakes |
Severely flawed sentence structure |
Grammar and word usage are so poor that they interfere with meaning; very poor mechanics (like punctuation) |
2 |
Position on topic is unclear or extremely limited; inappropriate examples or reasons; insufficient evidence |
Poorly organized; lacks focus; problems with coherence or flow of ideas |
Poor use of language; indicates very limited vocabulary and poor word choice |
Frequent problems with sentence structure |
Grammar and word usage mistakes are frequent and interfere with meaning; poor mechanics |
3 |
Position on topic demonstrates critical thinking skill applied inconsistently; inadequate examples, reasons or evidence |
Limited in organization and focus; demonstrates lapses in coherence or flow of ideas |
Displays developing use of language; contains indications of weak vocabulary and poor word selection |
Some problems with sentence structure; lacks a variety of sentence structures |
Contains many mistakes in grammar word usage and mechanics |
4 |
Position on topic demonstrates competent critical thinking skill; example, reasons and evidence are adequate |
Generally organized and focused; demonstrates some coherence and attention to the flow of ideas |
Displays adequate, but inconsistent, use of language; vocabulary used is generally appropriate |
Good sentence structure; demonstrates some variety of sentence structure |
Contains some mistakes in grammar, word usage and mechanics |
5 |
Position is effectively developed through strong critical thinking skill; examples, reasons and evidence are generally appropriate |
Well organized and focused; demonstrates coherence and ideas flow well |
Displays competent use of language; uses appropriate vocabulary |
Good sentence structure; demonstrates variety in sentence structure |
Generally free of mistakes in grammar, word usage and mechanics |
6 |
Position effectively and insightfully developed through outstanding critical thinking skill; examples, reasons and evidence are clearly appropriate |
Well organized and clearly focused; clearly coherent and ideas flow seamlessly |
Displays skillful use of language; vocabulary is accurate and varied; words are appropriately and skillfully chosen |
Good sentence structure; demonstrates meaningful and skilled variety of sentence structure |
Free of most mistakes in grammar, word usage and mechanics |
100 point essays: 50 point essays 6= 100 2=68 6=50 2= 34(68%) 5/6=96 1/2=64 5/6=48(96%) 1/ 2=32(64%) 5=92 1=60 5=46(92%) 1=30(60%) 4/5=88 4/5=44(88%) 4=84 4=42(84%) 3/4=80 3/4=40(80%) 3=76 3=38(76%) 2/3=72 2/3=36(72%) _
;